ACT Heritage Forum – rating the candidates


National Trust of Australia (ACT) hosted a public Heritage Election Forum at St John’s church hall in Reid last Thursday night 22 September.

Five ACT election candidates were invited to present for 15 minutes each. This format was different to that used at the Northside Kurrajong forum that was a Q&A with no speeches/presentations.

The invited candidates at this heritage forum were Marea Fatseas (Independent), Veronica Wensing (Greens), Alistair Coe (Liberal), Richard Farmer (Canberra Community Voters Party) and Mick Gentleman (Labor).

Heritage is probably a difficult subject for many career politicians to handle. Here’s the complex list of important proposals the National Trust had published previous to the forum:

  • Heritage Listing of Lake Burley Griffin and foreshores and Master Management Plans
  • Government approval of National Heritage Listing for Canberra
  • Redevelopment of Yarralumla Brickworks and Manuka Oval
  • Development of Conservation Management Plans for Heritage Housing Precincts
  • Introduction of Operational Assistance Funding for Peak Heritage/History/Conservation Bodies
  • Development of a new Heritage/History/Conservation hub near Blundell’s Cottage Site
  • Development of a History and Heritage Tourism Plan
  • Conduct of a Social and Economic Impact Study of the Heritage and History sector
  • A review of Planning policy and processes – Ministerial call-in powers and Standing community organisations when appealing to ACAT
  • Introduction of Local/territory classifications of heritage significance in the ACT

So what happened on the night?

The meeting nearly went off the rails with the first presenter, Mick Gentleman, who delivered the standard ‘the government is wonderful and planning is good’ speech. He stuck to this line with just about ever other response to any questions. I got really bored and wondered why was I sitting there on this cold night – the person sitting next to me said “I can’t do this” and then promptly left.

Richard Farmer talked about an open process and about honesty in government. Alistair Coe did quite well, knew his way around most of the topics, and made some positive commitments. He lost me again on his push for a Chief Engineer. He has a future in politics (I think that’s a compliment).

The real stars of the show were the two women.

Veronica Wensing knows her stuff and offered some constructive proposals for the city’s planning and within that its heritage. She said that the Greens would adopt all the listed proposals as put forward by the National Trust.

Marea Fatseas yet again could not be matched on her key strength in that she so clearly demonstrates that she knows what so many in community are thinking and about their passionate aspirations for good government. Marea was on top of the heritage issues, the environmental issues and that community engagement is the only way to go. She got the most applause.

The other big topics for everyone except Labor was the need for an integrity commissioner (or something similar), for more transparency, for a complete root and branch rework of the planning regimes, and for the LDA to be totally removed from planning (loud applause) – or for the LDA to be shut down completely.

My summary takes the form of ratings out of five – to indicate how the candidates performed in this particular forum being focussed on heritage, planning and community engagement.

  • Marea Fatseas (Independent) *****
  • Veronica Wensing (Greens) ***** 
  • Alistair Coe (Liberal) ***
  • Richard Farmer (Canberra Community Voters Party) *** 
  • Mick Gentleman (Labor) *

There were many new commitments made by most of the candidates – sadly not much from Labor. The National Trust ACT will be loading to their website a detailed report of what was said by the candidates.

Reminder: The early or pre-poll voting booths open Tuesday 27th Sept – click here for details.

Dealing with right wing nut jobs

shakey-P1050447-150x150It was indeed a sad story to see serious journalists and scientists trying to debate with the latest of the Australia’s right wing nut jobs on TV.

It should be known well by now that there is no use in using the usual polite and logical approaches with such people. It just feeds into their well practised weird ways of arguing or debating.

Continue reading Dealing with right wing nut jobs

Ageism and ACT politicians


Following weeks (or was that months) of questions over land dealings and major developments, and now audits being announced into departmental processes, the Chief Minister has  gone on the front foot and announced an idea to change his government’s methods of consulting on ‘Urban Redevelopment’.

Continue reading Ageism and ACT politicians

Blame the Griffins – Really?


When about 250 citizens venture out on a cold night to hear about plans for the foreshores of West Basin one would expect that they would be taken seriously.

Continue reading Blame the Griffins – Really?

Dickson DA goes to ACAT appeal


 Following the disappointing actions by the ACT Government to approve what remains a very questionable development application for a major mixed use development on the flagship shopping centre site in Dickson, appeals are being jointly lodged by the landlord of the Woolworths supermarket plus key local community associations.

Continue reading Dickson DA goes to ACAT appeal

The Art Newspaper – Wrong about The Bishop Museum


An open letter to The Art Newspaper( 29 July) plus correspondence (5 August 2016)

Over many years I have accessed the Art Newspaper and when appropriate have either passed on links or have posted articles online that have links back to the Art Newspaper.

Continue reading The Art Newspaper – Wrong about The Bishop Museum